【翻译自mos文章】当NFS server 宕机后，Oracle 数据库 冻结并且alert 文件里没有任何错误

当NFS server 宕机后，Oracle 数据库 冻结并且alert 文件里没有任何错误

翻译自mos文章：When NFS Server Is Down, Oracle Server Freezes With No Errors In Alert Log File (文档 ID 1316251.1)

适用于：
Oracle Server - Enterprise Edition - Version: 10.2.0.4 and later   [Release: 10.2 and later ]
IBM AIX on POWER Systems (64-bit)
症状：
AIX上的Oracle instance 有一个NFS 挂载点，该挂载点基于backup 的目的。 该挂载点mount时的选项如下：

bg,hard,intr,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,sec=sys,noac,rw

当NFS Server 宕机时，Ooracle RDMBS 冻结，并且alert 日志中没有任何错误。当NFS Sserver 恢复后，database 也正常工作，没有任何问题。

改变：
环境没有改变，仅仅是丢失了NAS connectivity（to NFS Server）,因此远程的目录不可访问。
原因：

从上传的sqlplus 和df 的 tusss跟踪来看，我们可以看到statx 命令在 /backup处挂起。

462940: statx("./../../../../backup", 0x0FFFFFFFFFFF5980, 176, 021) (sleeping...)
561338: kread(14, " ? ? J ?\0\0\0\0\0\0\010".., 64) Err#82 ERESTART
561338: Received signal #2, SIGINT [caught]
561338: sigprocmask(0, 0x0FFFFFFFFFFF3620, 0x0000000000000000) = 0
561338: sigprocmask(1, 0x0FFFFFFFFFFF3620, 0x0000000000000000) = 0
561338: ksetcontext_sigreturn(0x0FFFFFFFFFFF37A0, 0x0000000000000000, 0x00000001100F04F0,
0x800000000000D032, 0x3000000000000000, 0x0000000000000360, 0x0000000000000000, 0x0000000000000000)
561338: kread(14, " ? ? J ?\0\0\0\0\0\0\010".., 64) Err#82 ERESTART
561338: Received signal #2, SIGINT [caught]
561338: sigprocmask(0, 0x0FFFFFFFFFFF3620, 0x0000000000000000) = 0
561338: sigprocmask(1, 0x0FFFFFFFFFFF3620, 0x0000000000000000) = 0
561338: ksetcontext_sigreturn(0x0FFFFFFFFFFF37A0, 0x0000000000000000, 0x00000001100F04F0,
0x800000000000D032, 0x3000000000000000, 0x0000000000000320, 0x0000000000000000, 0x0000000000000000)
561338: kread(14, " ? ? J ?\0\0\0\0\0\0\010".., 64) Err#82 ERESTART
561338: Received signal #2, SIGINT [caught]
561338: sigprocmask(0, 0x0FFFFFFFFFFF3620, 0x0000000000000000) = 0
561338: sigprocmask(1, 0x0FFFFFFFFFFF3620, 0x0000000000000000) = 0
561338: ksetcontext_sigreturn(0x0FFFFFFFFFFF37A0, 0x0000000000000000, 0x00000001100F04F0,
0x800000000000D032, 0x3000000000000000, 0x0000000000000310, 0x0000000000000000, 0x0000000000000000)
561338: kread(14, " ? ? J ?\0\0\0\0\0\0\010".., 64) Err#82 ERESTART
561338: Received signal #2, SIGINT [caught]
561338: sigprocmask(0, 0x0FFFFFFFFFFF3620, 0x0000000000000000) = 0
561338: sigprocmask(1, 0x0FFFFFFFFFFF3620, 0x0000000000000000) = 0
561338: ksetcontext_sigreturn(0x0FFFFFFFFFFF37A0, 0x0000000000000000, 0x00000001100F04F0,
0x800000000000D032, 0x3000000000000000, 0x0000000000000310, 0x0000000000000000, 0x0000000000000000)
561338: kread(14, " ? ? J ?\0\0\0\0\0\0\010".., 64) Err#82 ERESTART
561338: Received signal #2, SIGINT [caught]
561338: sigprocmask(0, 0x0FFFFFFFFFFF3620, 0x0000000000000000) = 0
561338: sigprocmask(1, 0x0FFFFFFFFFFF3620, 0x0000000000000000) = 0
561338: ksetcontext_sigreturn(0x0FFFFFFFFFFF37A0, 0x0000000000000000, 0x00000001100F04F0,
0x800000000000D032, 0x3000000000000000, 0x0000000000000320, 0x0000000000000000, 0x0000000000000000)
561338: kread(14, " ? ? J ?\0\0\0\0\0\0\010".., 64) (sleeping...)
462940: statx("./../../../../backup", 0x0FFFFFFFFFFF5980, 176, 021) = 0
462940: statx("./../../../../usr", 0x0FFFFFFFFFFF5980, 176, 021) = 0
462940: statx("./../../../../lib", 0x0FFFFFFFFFFF5980, 176, 021) = 0
462940: statx("./../../../../audit", 0x0FFFFFFFFFFF5980, 176, 021) = 0
462940: statx("./../../../../dev", 0x0FFFFFFFFFFF5980, 176, 021) = 0
462940: statx("./../../../../etc", 0x0FFFFFFFFFFF5980, 176, 021) = 0
462940: statx("./../../../../u", 0x0FFFFFFFFFFF5980, 176, 021) = 0
462940: statx("./../../../../lpp", 0x0FFFFFFFFFFF5980, 176, 021) = 0
462940: statx("./../../../../mnt", 0x0FFFFFFFFFFF5980, 176, 021) = 0
462940: statx("./../../../../proc", 0x0FFFFFFFFFFF5980, 176, 021) = 0
462940: statx("./../../../../sbin", 0x0FFFFFFFFFFF5980, 176, 021) = 0
462940: statx("./../../../../bin", 0x0FFFFFFFFFFF5980, 176, 021) = 0
462940: statx("./../../../../oracle", 0x0FFFFFFFFFFF5980, 176, 021) = 0

问题在下面的地方：

statx("./../../../../backup", 0x0FFFFFFFFFFF5980, 176, 021) (sleeping...)

Oracle 程序（代码）调用一个Unix 系统调用（system call）， ‘getcwd‘来得到当前的工作目录。在这之后，所有的控制权归还给操作系统。
从我们所看到的， 函数‘getcwd‘ 调用‘getwd‘，而‘getwd‘会依次调用‘statx‘。一旦‘statx‘被执行，它就按照 下面的顺序 通过执行‘statx‘ 开始处理directory entries

./
./..
./../..
./../../.. (this goes on until the root directory is reached)

一旦 root 目录（/）被到达，那么对于目录中的每个entry，‘lstat‘会调用 ‘statx‘。Oracle 完全不控制这个处理过程，因此为了防止此情况发生，我们做不了任何事情（这完全是os级别的事情）

解决方法：
从一个类似问题中，IBM 已经建议下面的 action plan  以避免这个问题。来自IBM的回答是：

Here's a solution to avoid the problem described by Oracle: 
DO NOT have the NFS mounts directly under /, but put them one level lower. Then, we can use symbolic links to them.

NFS mount point on node  /nfs/backup (/nfs is a directory we'll create, it can have any name) and create a softlink /backup -> /nfs/backup.
 
$ ln -s /nfs/backup /backup

This will avoid the statx problem without having to make changes in the setup (because /backup is still there).

Additionally you can ask IBM about APAR # IZ85027, IZ85029, IZ85032, IZ86102, IZ87374, IZ90533.

Check with IBM which one applies to your configuration.

原文：http://blog.csdn.net/msdnchina/article/details/43866323